Showing just the changes made in the edit by Joseph Downie at 2011-11-30 13:55:10 UTC
See all changes since this wiki was released
Title: X.b Commercial lighting, appliances, and catering Costs Content: h1 Technologies costed in this sector * Lighting * Lighting controls * Fridge/freezers Please see: Commercial lighting and appliances cost data Excluded are the cost of switching from gas to electric cookers and the cost of energy demand for cooking. Electricity demand from the non-domestic sector are included in costs. h1 Costs Methodology h2 Methodology used The two levers for this sector are energy demand (for both cooking and electricity) and electrification of cooking. We are costing only the demand reduction of electricity for lighting and appliances, note electricity demand for heating and cooling is streated seperately in: IX.c Commercial heating and cooling Costs. Lighting and appliances demand from the non-domestic sector can roughly be split into 3 service demands[Adapted from MARKAL 3.4 documentation]: | Demand | % Electricity | | Lighting | 53% | | Refrigeration | 18% | | Other | 29% | The costs we have collected so far address the first two but we would welcome costs for other appliance demands, although given the uncertainty out to 2050 of machinery/appliances used it may be better to focus on the first two demands which are unlikely to change. Our cost driver for this sector is the difference between level 1 electricity demand and the level chosen by the user. This gives us TWh demand reduction from 2007-2050. We then multiply this by the energy saving assumptions from Commercial lighting and appliances cost data, which are represented in £/TWh lighting and appliances demand reduction. The figure used is defined by the bundles of technologies we have assumed for each level of demand reduction, this is summarised below: | Level | Low | High | | 1 | 0 | - | | 2 | 95,059,012 | 329,485,676 | | 3 | 310,688,997 | 621,377,994 | | 4 | 329,485,676 | 658,971,352 | The low costs are derived by taking the cheapest bundle of energy saving measures based on the cumulative saving needed for that level (see table below). The high costs for level 2 are assumed to be the highest average cost of all the technologies. Level 3 and 4 high costs are simply 100% the low costs in the absence of more data. | Technology Package | Max. TWh Saving | Cumulative max. TWh saving | (£2010 per TWh) | | Presence Detectors for Lighting | 2.3 | 2.3 | £326,391 | | Stairwell Timers for Lighting | 1.4 | 3.7 | £349,705 | | Most EE Freezers | 0.7 | 4.4 | £28,442,648 | | IRC Tungsten-Halogen - Spots | 1.0 | 5.3 | £41,498,290 | | Most EE Fridges | 0.7 | 6.0 | £42,430,836 | | Most EE Fridge-freezers | 0.0 | 6.1 | £106,776,500 | | ECG CFLs Replace Lamps | 3.7 | 9.8 | £223,811,004 | | 16 mm Fluorescent Tubes Replace 26mm | 1.6 | 11.4 | £225,209,823 | | Metal Halide Floodlights | 0.4 | 11.8 | £255,983,836 | | HF Ballast | 5.9 | 17.7 | £454,149,829 | | Basic Lighting Timers | 6.7 | 24.4 | £472,334,473 | | Sunrise-Sunset Timers | 0.7 | 25.2 | £1,261,268,262 | | Light Detectors | 0.7 | 25.9 | £5,917,003,419 | Please see 2050 Methodology for a full description of the costs approach in the Calculator. h2 Methodology issues and uncertainties * Cooking demand reduction ought to also be costed * The Markal technology packages for energy reduction are based on the baseline of lighting and appliances demand in MARKAL and the BRE study [Pout C and MacKenzie F (2006), Reducing Carbon Emissions from Commercial and Public Sector Buildings in the UK, BRE Client Report for Global Atmosphere Division, DEFRA.]. We have assumed the baseline scenarios are broadly similar, however the inconsistency of baselines may change costs. * We have assumed electrification of cooking is largely immaterial and we do not have a known split of gas to electric cooking equipment in the non-domestic sector but this may be a significant cost h1 Questions to stakeholders * Can we add costs for cooking demand reductions? Please click here to add costs: Commercial cooking demand reduction cost data * Should electrification of cooking be costed? Is it a significant/material cost? Do we have estimates on the current split of cooking energy demand being provided by electric or gas cookers? h1 Technical Assumptions Only demands for cooking and lighting and appliances, please see level 1 assumptions: | Non-domestic demand (exc heating), TWh | 2007 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 | | Lighting and Appliances (electricity) demand | 59.16 | 59.57 | 61.67 | 63.84 | 66.10 | 68.45 | 70.88 | 73.41 | 76.03 | 78.76 | | Cooking demand | 22.46 | 22.47 | 22.49 | 22.51 | 22.53 | 22.55 | 22.57 | 22.59 | 22.61 | 22.63 | h1General Comments Please use this space to make any general comments. Please add your name when commenting. Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions User: Joseph Downie Picture updated at: Signed off by: Signed off at: |
Title: X.b Commercial lighting, appliances, and catering Costs Content: h1 Technologies costed in this sector * Lighting * Lighting controls * Fridge/freezers Please see: Commercial lighting and appliances cost data Excluded are the cost of switching from gas to electric cookers and the cost of energy demand for cooking. Electricity demand from the non-domestic sector are included in costs. h1 Costs Methodology h2 Methodology used The two levers for this sector are energy demand (for both cooking and electricity) and electrification of cooking. We are costing only the demand reduction of electricity for lighting and appliances, note electricity demand for heating and cooling is streated seperately in: IX.c Commercial heating and cooling Costs. Lighting and appliances demand from the non-domestic sector can roughly be split into 3 service demands[Adapted from MARKAL 3.4 documentation]: | Demand | % Electricity | | Lighting | 53% | | Refrigeration | 18% | | Other | 29% | The costs we have collected so far address the first two but we would welcome costs for other appliance demands, although given the uncertainty out to 2050 of machinery/appliances used it may be better to focus on the first two demands which are unlikely to change. Our cost driver for this sector is the difference between level 1 electricity demand and the level chosen by the user. This gives us TWh demand reduction from 2007-2050. We then multiply this by the energy saving assumptions from Commercial lighting and appliances cost data, which are represented in £/TWh lighting and appliances demand reduction. The figure used is defined by the bundles of technologies we have assumed for each level of demand reduction, this is summarised below: | Level | Low | High | | 1 | 0 | - | | 2 | 95,059,012 | 329,485,676 | | 3 | 310,688,997 | 621,377,994 | | 4 | 329,485,676 | 658,971,352 | The low costs are derived by taking the cheapest bundle of energy saving measures based on the cumulative saving needed for that level (see table below). The high costs for level 2 are assumed to be the highest average cost of all the technologies. Level 3 and 4 high costs are simply 100% the low costs in the absence of more data. | Technology Package | Max. TWh Saving | Cumulative max. TWh saving | (£2010 per TWh) | | Presence Detectors for Lighting | 2.3 | 2.3 | £326,391 | | Stairwell Timers for Lighting | 1.4 | 3.7 | £349,705 | | Most EE Freezers | 0.7 | 4.4 | £28,442,648 | | IRC Tungsten-Halogen - Spots | 1.0 | 5.3 | £41,498,290 | | Most EE Fridges | 0.7 | 6.0 | £42,430,836 | | Most EE Fridge-freezers | 0.0 | 6.1 | £106,776,500 | | ECG CFLs Replace Lamps | 3.7 | 9.8 | £223,811,004 | | 16 mm Fluorescent Tubes Replace 26mm | 1.6 | 11.4 | £225,209,823 | | Metal Halide Floodlights | 0.4 | 11.8 | £255,983,836 | | HF Ballast | 5.9 | 17.7 | £454,149,829 | | Basic Lighting Timers | 6.7 | 24.4 | £472,334,473 | | Sunrise-Sunset Timers | 0.7 | 25.2 | £1,261,268,262 | | Light Detectors | 0.7 | 25.9 | £5,917,003,419 | Please see 2050 Methodology for a full description of the costs approach in the Calculator. h2 Methodology issues and uncertainties * Cooking demand reduction ought to also be costed * The Markal technology packages for energy reduction are based on the baseline of lighting and appliances demand in MARKAL and the BRE study [Pout C and MacKenzie F (2006), Reducing Carbon Emissions from Commercial and Public Sector Buildings in the UK, BRE Client Report for Global Atmosphere Division, DEFRA.]. We have assumed the baseline scenarios are broadly similar, however the inconsistency of baselines may change costs. * We have assumed electrification of cooking is largely immaterial and we do not have a known split of gas to electric cooking equipment in the non-domestic sector but this may be a significant cost h1 Questions to stakeholders * Can we add costs for cooking demand reductions? Please click here to add costs: Commercial cooking demand reduction cost data * Should electrification of cooking be costed? Is it a significant/material cost? Do we have estimates on the current split of cooking energy demand being provided by electric or gas cookers? h1 Technical Assumptions Only demands for cooking and lighting and appliances, please see level 1 assumptions: | Non-domestic demand (exc heating), TWh | 2007 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 | | Lighting and Appliances (electricity) demand | 59.16 | 59.57 | 61.67 | 63.84 | 66.10 | 68.45 | 70.88 | 73.41 | 76.03 | 78.76 | | Cooking demand | 22.46 | 22.47 | 22.49 | 22.51 | 22.53 | 22.55 | 22.57 | 22.59 | 22.61 | 22.63 | h1 General Comments Please use this space to make any general comments. Please add your name when commenting. Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions User: Joseph Downie Picture updated at: Signed off by: Signed off at: |