Showing just the changes made in the edit by Joseph Downie at 2011-11-30 13:28:35 UTC
See all changes since this wiki was released
Title: Micro wind costs Content: h1 Lead and sign-off 2050 Costs team lead - Michael Clark Working-level analyst - Henry Shennan, Ben Marriot(DECC) Senior analyst - Sam Thomas, Rocio Concha h1 Data sources Markal3.24Doc ESME h1 Technologies costed in this sector * Micro wind turbine (0.11KW) h1 Onshore wind turbine Costs summary (£ per KW): | Year | High | Low | High | Low | | Year | IC | IC | FOC | FOC | | Year | £/KW | £/KW | £/KW | £/KW | | 2010 | 9000 | 1581 | 0 | 0 | | 2050 | 9000 | 1230 | 0 | 0 | Cost per 0.11KW turbine: | Year | High | Low | High | Low | | Year | IC | IC | FOC | FOC | | Year | £/KW | £/KW | £/KW | £/KW | | 2010 | 990 | 174 | 0 | 0 | | 2050 | 990 | 135.3 | 0 | 0 | h2 Current Calculator assumptions * Lifetime = 25yrs [MARKAL] * Efficiency = Capacity factor = 24% * Input Fuel = Wind h2 Cost sources assumptions * MARKAL: 10-20% availability factor, 25 year lifetime * EMSE: Pole mounted, 2% availability factor, 20 years economic life h1 Issues, concerns and questions * The capacity factor appears quite ambitious in comparison to other models Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions User: Michael Clark Picture updated at: Signed off by: Signed off at: |
Title: IV.c Small-scale wind Costs Content: h1 Technologies costed in this sector * Micro wind turbine (0.11KW) - Please see: Microwind cost data h1 Costs Methodology h2 Methodology used The user defines the number of micro wind turbines. Once the trajectory is set by the user, the number of plants to be built are defined. Investment costs are a function of new build and operating cost are a function of the number of plants operating within that time period. We assume turbines retire after 25 years and the cost of replacement is included. Please see 2050 Methodology for a full description of the costs approach in the Calculator. h2 Methodology issues and uncertainties * The capacity factor appears quite ambitious in comparison to other models h1 Technical Assumptions * Lifetime = 25yrs [MARKAL] * Efficiency = Capacity factor = 24% * Input Fuel = Wind h1 General Comments Please use this space to make any general comments. Please add your name when commenting. Category: Sector by sector cost assumptions User: Joseph Downie Picture updated at: Signed off by: Signed off at: |